Connection out of standard every single day sodium and you will potassium removal that have SBP

Relative frequency shipments away from (a) SBP transform, (Gaussian complement Roentgen 2 to own salt painful and sensitive = 0.74 and you can sodium resistant = 0.97) and (b) urinary Na + /K + , (Gaussian complement Roentgen 2 to have sodium sensitive = 0.99 and you will salt resistant some one = 0.99) from the group of sodium sensitive (letter = 71) and salt resistant (letter = 119) individuals with alter out-of dieting input away from Losing weight Solutions to Prevent Blood circulation pressure (DASH) large sodium (HS) eating plan so you can Dashboard low salt (LS) diet.

Participant class

Certainly investigation members examined, 53% off SR and you will 62% of your own SS professionals was indeed women, 51% of SR and you may 63% of SS professionals was basically African-Western (Table step 1). More participants had been aged 29–55 many years, college-knowledgeable, and operating full time. There are no tall variations in standard qualities to own data participants round the ethnicity otherwise sex in a choice of the brand new SS or SR communities (Desk step 1).

Baseline SBP, assessed during the screening visit prior to dietary intervention was significantly higher in SS (137.6 ± 8.7 mmHg) vs. SR participants (132.5 ± 9.6 mmHg; p < 0.05, Table 2). In contrast there was no significant difference in 24 h urinary Na + excretion, 24 h urinary K + excretion and the urinary Na + :K + ratio between SS and SR participants at screening (Table 2). Further, there was no significant effect of sex or ethnicity on these variables, as such subsequent analyses were not adjusted for age or ethnicity. In SS, but not SR participants, each additional g/day in urinary Na + excretion across the range of <2 g/day to 5 g/day resulted in a higher SBP value of approximately 1.0 ± 0.4 mmHg in SBP/g Na + excretion (Fig. 2a). The measures >5 g/day Na+ were not included due to increased sample variability. When assessed by linear regression across the entire range of observed Na + excretion we observed no correlation between urinary Na + excretion and SBP in either SS (R 2 = 0.02) or SR (R 2 = 0.02) participants (Fig. 2b). In both SS and SR participants urinary K + excretion of <1 g/day elevated SBP by 3.9 and 4.8 mmHg respectively vs. SBP values obtained for urinary excretion of 1–1.99gK + /day (Fig. 3a) and the Cohen's D score for the difference in the SBP among the participants with less than 1 g/day versus 1-1.9 g/day of urinary K + excretion showed a medium effect size in both SS (0.45) and the SR (0.49) group. However, when assessed across the entire range of observed K + excretion we observed no correlation between K + excretion and SBP in either SS (R 2 = 0.001) or SR (R 2 = 0.008) participants (Fig. 3b). Further, we observed no association between the urinary Na + :K + ratio and SBP and no impact of urinary K + excretion across any dietary Na + excretion range on SBP in either SS (R 2 = 0.004) or SR (R 2 = 0.002) participants (Fig. 4a, b).

Effect off Dashboard eating plan towards the relationship off urinary sodium so you’re able to potassium removal proportion which have SBP

Within the sub group of SS participants randomly assigned to DASH-Sodium dietary intervention arm (N = 71) there was a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in SBP on the DASH-LS diet compared to the baseline screening SBP value (Table 3). In the sub group of SR participants randomly assigned to the DASH-Sodium intervention (N = 119) there were significant (p < 0.05) reductions in SBP on both the DASH-HS and DASH-LS diets compared to the baseline screening SBP value (Table 3). On the DASH-Sodium diet, following both the LS and HS interventions compared to screening there was a significant (p < 0.05) increase in urinary K + excretion and reduction in the urinary Na + :K + ratio (that was greater during the LS intervention), in both SS and SR participants (Table 3).